← Evidence

Experiment 001 · Modeled · Not live-tested

Nine people.
One hour.
Still no decision.

The meeting was not a collaboration problem. It was an accountability problem wearing a calendar invitation.

9 people1 hour weekly$46.60 hourly assumption$419 weekly cost

The calculation

What does this ritual cost?

  1. Weekly9 people × 1 hour × $46.60 = $419.40
  2. Annually$419.40 × 50 meetings = $20,970
  3. Not includedPreparation, follow-up, delay, rework or context switching.

Compensation assumption: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, private-industry employer compensation cost for March 2026. This is an illustrative estimate, not the cost of a named company or actual meeting.

View compensation source →

What happened

The hour.

  1. First 10 minutesWaiting for everyone to join.
  2. Next 25 minutesRecapping information that already existed.
  3. Next 17 minutesDiscovering one actual blocker.
  4. Final 8 minutesDebating ownership and scheduling a follow-up.

Then it became my job to follow up.

The modeled replacement

Zero Status

One AI status operator collects the evidence, identifies what changed, finds the blocker and sends the decision to the person authorized to make it.

  1. 01Collect

    Tasks, deadlines, comments and metrics.

  2. 02Verify

    Compare each claim with the project record.

  3. 03Detect

    Find risks, contradictions and missing owners.

  4. 04Route

    Send one decision to one accountable human.

  5. 05Record

    Save the decision, owner, deadline and evidence.

Sample output · Not live data

Not another dashboard.
The finished update.

Campaign launch · Sample weekly status

At risk.

What moved

Landing-page copy approved. Twelve campaign assets completed. Tracking links verified.

Blocked

Video export is waiting on final product footage.

One decision needs you

Choose between launching Thursday without video or moving the complete launch to Friday.

Meeting required in this model: No

How it earns credibility

Prove it before canceling anything.

The first pilot will run the existing meeting and Zero Status in parallel. The meeting disappears only if the replacement finds the same risks, preserves ownership and creates a better decision record.

1 · Run in parallel2 · Compare risks found3 · Measure human time4 · Audit incorrect summaries5 · Cancel only after proof

I don’t want AI attending the meeting. I want it to remove the conditions that made the meeting necessary.

Return to the evidence →